|
To
C3-be or
c3-not to be, that is the Question!
The prevailing Option I limits people to
striving for mass-attractivity within the spirit of the time, which is
now changing increasingly faster with seemingly nobody in charge
anymore.
Option II encourages and challenges
people to fulfill their tasks in view of their life-fulfillment.
Personally
relevant Approach:
You will learn under Option I that c3 requires the skill to impose onto
others in order to
> command#0
(creatively aiming at a position of power; easy to get at for self, hard
to convince others of and thus opt for "anything goes")
while execution should
not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to
come to harm. This would require understanding each other! If you want to
master something or someone, your should serve its, his or her purpose
rather than misuse things and people merely competing for
power...
>control#1
(aiming at
position of power in the evolution of things, e.g. with technology;
complex to get there, easy to prove like Kim Jong-Il when he exploded a dirty
atom bomb to black mail the world)
while
judgment should be based on serving the task fulfillment of those people
involved, except where that would conflict
with loyalty#0 (to control fear instead, Peter denied Jesus
when the cock crowed three times),
and
>communicate#2
(aiming at
definition power; hard to get, say winning an election, easy to verify
e.g. by the
majority of
opinions)
while
the sender's existence must be safe
as long as such protection does not conflict with
language convention#2
and staying in
control#1
of the situation e.g. even for passing on bad news, but against
tricksters with their
rhetoric,
Option I
enforced structural power
and
non-sequitur with simplifying category errors
(snake in paradise, Judas' kiss)...
All c3 together instead of
accepting the Option II mindset
indicated,
simply aims at
convincing
people to go beyond
who they are
to serve some hidden agenda. This of course assumes in
hidden ways,
that people have no
X-personal substance to be accounted for,
other than
just what
is desirable for the required skills. This is commonly referred to as
theory X
- which in fact promotes a mindset negating X in the typical
value reversal so that evil Option I intentions may prevail...
Factual Approach:
On the other, less know side, the
Option II C3-approach
>understands#3 and acknowledges
(aiming creatively
at definition power based on one's substance at least over one's life -
which is easy to get for conscious people, but hard to get it across to
others and is thereby declared as not politically correct to say the
least)
God as the Creator of all
the Creation and as also having created me and you, and all beings as his Creatures
about whom he cares to
fulfill their substance
with their
life. Correspondingly Jesus Christ has set the outstanding example of what
that entails and its meaning, and pointed out the support we get from the
Holy Spirit in believing in him in our
conscience.
In short, there is
cause and responsive action to be considered, rather than the
mono-political approach
under the, in the end
social Darwinian,
meaningless Option I hoax.
Success promising Approach:
To do justice to Option II you need to believe in being able
to sufficiently
understand
the substances (God-Jesus-the Holy
Spirit-self-others-nature-world-and
its temptations) involved in your life, and then give meaning to their
fulfillment to meet the requirement for a fulfilled life. And that needs
to be so, before
you use power
and psycho-politics as the
sole option under Option I. In short, resorting to
Option I might seem necessary, while only going along your
path with
Option II, and coping with the truth towards of
life- through task-fulfillment is
sufficient. And that is what Jesus Christ as such, introduced...
Human
Approach:
It is only with an Option II mindset
that any real human
being can be acknowledged to have the §1-right to express his or her, God created
X-substance with appropriate open-ended
generative principles,
oegp.
The human rights rhetoric under Option I, however, has no substance and
can, and is therefore easily misused.
Human Cooperation: When it
comes to human cooperation, Option I leaves people other-determined,
either as managers of others with hidden agendas, as perpetrator, or as
their victims. Option II,
however allows us to focus on the innate §2-purpose of one's
X-substance.
And that is where the
%1-politcal correctness comes in
by
dividing §1 to rule §2
with a "yes - but" to what you try to §1-express; after all this
is supposing humans to be mere social beings as if God were a tinkerer
with what he had created for each of us to §1-express! And so §1
degenerates to the famous cry of Edward Munch, the brand mark of
Option I, now the most expensive picture after it was auctioned 2012
at Sotheby for 120 Mio. Dollar:
Personal
Growth: Only if one follows one's innate §2-purpose can
their be
personal growth
in terms of focusing with §3-integrity
towards §0-sustainable inner growth. And whoever has had that
experience can B1-believe in something higher than Option I, the
proof of which comes in the then possible B2-breakthrough. Here we are at the
cross-road;
whoever turns to %1 is bound to have §2>§3 %5-manipulated in
order to %6-project something mass-attractive instead of §3>§0.
And without the latter experience, there is no basis to genuinely
B1-believe anything before it has manifested as common sense and that
then becomes a dead end rather than a possibility for a B2-breakthrough!
Quality
Control: Jesus Christ has introduced the quality control
of believing in terms of the B3-path
that in B4-truth
allows B5-life- through task
fulfillment in, and beyond the Option I
world. Whoever does
not follow Jesus on his or her G3>G4>G5 is torn between %1-adaptation
and wanting +2 more of the same lust for %5-self- made
appearances, and the
-4 frustration of having to %6
convince others to get away with its bluff...
Meaningful
Innovation:
Giving meaning
beyond one's mortal life to the
H1-hope into God's H2-higher order gains the impact to transcend the
%1-politcal correctness with which the Option I world evokes and
imposes its self-destructive consequences via the evil spirit of the time ("Arglist
der Zeit" as the "Eidgenossen" referred it to in the founding
constitution of Swiss Federation 1291). However, the hopeless ones
are merely left to *3-survive the "+2/-4 struggle and thus become
susceptible for ?0-ideologies and inner fantasies, idolatry...
Success
Experience: In our time it has become utterly apparent that there is
no real success experience under Option I, only
in tune with Option II's H2,
which leads to an H3-inner relationship to reality which can be
shared by people sharing H2 and that leads to successful people in
successful communities as a precondition for
LifeFulfilling Platforms,
which the body of Christ is supposed to be. And only that kind of
society allows a sufficient
H4-insight into the
relevant substantiality's of self,
others, and
how God wants us to fulfill them. Lacking substance, one is left to
cope with the trend of the ZG-zeitgeist
under the madness of the
mono-political Option I!
Personal
Responsibility: What is not based on sufficient H4-awareness,
cannot be turned into otherwise
unconditional L1-love which flows naturally and bears
fruit. Once effect of causes become apparent, we are called for L2-Timely
Exchange of Project-Oriented Competence, which Jesus did by resurrecting
so we may be saved rather than getting lost in the permanently
self-destructive Option I world. So the question is, how much time
do you spend in your head to have a mass-attractive image and how
much is left to
implement insights...
Matter
of Fact: And last but not least,
every new born child,
every new
insight,
requires some kind of L3-reframing the
%1-traditional
H2-order so the seed may grow, rather than get lost on gravel or in
thorny bushes. And so Jesus transcended death beyond the thorny crown
and being nailed to the cross by the c3-scribs with his L3-ressurection
to save those who B1-believe in him as being the son of him, who is, who
he is; God. And in John 14:12 we are called to follow Jesus'
example, and
fulfill our life similarly with our X-substance
from our §1- to our L3-state of being as our
16 essential resources.
So we are left with the unresolved problem under Option I, that
of the proper relationship between
real people
and the
objective environment
and the
collective structure and its projected
trend,
perceived as ones cross or frame.
Since Option I ignores the
essence of real
problem, the Option I world cannot solve its real problems.
So the question remains how much of YOUR problem you project onto some
available scapegoats as did the scribes with Jesus, only to have their
temple, their frame destroyed some forty years after the crucifixion. On
the other hand for those not condemned under Option I,
Jesus is still alive and ready with the Holy Spirit to help us solve our
problems, with Option II...
So we are left with the ultimate struggle,
Option
II for individual life-through task fulfillment
and
Option I for
mass-attractivity
in one's attempt to Bm-multiply one's hidden agenda as boundary
conditions as the power to instrumentalize others and above all one's
own X-essence for agendas determined by the eight non-essentials states
(%1-%5-%6, "2/-4, *3, ?0, ZG-zeitgeist) in the ultimate struggle:
Option II#3
and
Option I#1,#2,#0
personally relevant#3 Definition Power
personally-neutral#2
Creativity
Evolution
appearance#0
Position Power
content-free#1
|
